IS BEING POSITIVE THE BEST THING?

Both "being positive" and "being negative" have their roles and contexts, depending on what the goals are and the responsibilities involved. Here's a more nuanced look at your two questions:

QUESTION 1: WHEN LOOKING TO MAKE MONEY FROM AN OPPORTUNITY, IS IT BETTER TO BE POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE?

In financial or business opportunities where the risks and consequences belong to others (e.g., as an investor or consultant), having a balanced approach can be beneficial:

Being Positive: Optimism can help you see opportunities that others might miss. You might be more willing to take calculated risks, and your positive outlook can even inspire confidence in others, leading to more opportunities.

Being Negative: A more cautious or skeptical perspective can help you identify the risks and pitfalls that might come with a given opportunity. This can be particularly valuable when the risks and consequences belong to others, as it can help protect you from ethical lapses or legal issues.

So, rather than being purely positive or negative, you might aim to be realistically optimistic while conducting rigorous due diligence.

QUESTION 2: WHEN BUILDING SYSTEMS THAT AFFECT HUMANITY, THE PLANET, CLIMATE, AND ECOLOGY, IS IT BETTER TO BE POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE?

When you're dealing with systems that have broad societal or ecological impact, the stakes are incredibly high, and both optimism and caution have important roles to play:

Being Positive: A positive mindset can be important for driving innovation and inspiring people to achieve something meaningful. Solving big problems often requires the belief that solutions are possible.

Being Negative: In these contexts, what you refer to as "being negative" might better be described as being cautious, rigorous, or skeptical. When the potential impact is broad and profound, caution and rigorous testing are essential for avoiding unintended negative consequences.

In these scenarios, it's often useful to engage in "systems thinking," where you try to anticipate the various ways in which a system could interact with other systems and affect different stakeholders, including non-human ones like ecosystems.

In summary, neither unbridled positivity nor unyielding negativity is generally the "best" approach in either context. A balanced perspective, which incorporates both optimistic drive and cautious risk-assessment, is often the most responsible and effective strategy.

Thinking Feeling Being
https://www.linkedin.com/company/thinkingfeelingbeing
We support people and organisations achieve their goals through facilitation, workshops, mentoring, mediation and sharing change resources

#mediation #coach #mentor #philosophy #psychology #purpose #thinking #feeling #icfcoach #coaching #facilitation, #workshops, #mentoring, #mediation #changeresources

Tim@ThinkingFeelingBeing.com
Mob 447797762051
https://www.linkedin.com/in/timhjrogers/